Supreme Court Decision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Supreme Court Decision - Essay ExampleThe evidence culled by these text messages intercepted by the police, when considered, does establish beyond any doubt that the accused was indeed engaging in unreasonable activities, which jeopardized the lives of the artless citizens. Thereby the initiation of the interception of the text messages of the accused by the police, considering the fact that the police was under an immense tweet to act in time, to avoid any further loss of life of the innocent citizens, was no appearance unreasonable. This act of the police when seen in the larger context seems totally reasonable. It does need to be mentioned that the trespass article of belief facilitated by Olmstead v. United States (1928) if applied to the situation under consideration, validate the interception of Does text messages by the police without invoking any violation of the Fourth Amendment Rights, as the police while doing so no modal value violated the essential dignity of the ac cused as a human and as a citizen.Besides, the twain pronged test propounded in Katz v. United States (1967), when applied to the issue under consideration does nullify the salute made by the accused. While exchanging the text messages associated with his il well-grounded activities, the accused was no way exhibiting an expectation of covert as he was well aware that he was exchanging these text messages with the intention to facilitate his un virtueful activities, and thereby, through the exercise of commonsense, was well aware that such messages and communications would attract the well deserved attention of the law and order machinery. Doe was well aware that he was relying for the exchange of these text messages on the services sell by the local cell phone carrier, and in the light of United States v. Miller (1975), Does rights were not infringed upon if the company as a third party, entrusted his text messages to the police, guided by the belief that it was its legal and con stitutional duty to help the police. Besides,