Saturday, March 9, 2019
How does Bennett present different teaching styles in ‘The History Boys’?
Bennett presents three contrasting apprizeing styles in the History Boys through the characters of Hector, Mrs Lintott, and Irwin. all(a) three of the characters charter their own unique attitude towards the boys impending Oxbridge trial runinations, put the boys in the difficult position of having to keep a reasonable equilibrize between doctrine and learning styles whilst making every effort to keep open the good-humoured relationships they have with each of their teachers, as well as melodic phrase to achieve well in their tryoutinations.Whilst Hector brands the boys Oxbridge aspirations as silliness, he has a dedication and lie with for knowledge which he imparts during his lessons, and generally, to his students. While on the offspring of General Studies, he quotes All knowledge is precious whether or not it serves the slightest human use, which encapsulates, in one phrase, how highly he values every kind of knowledge as well as how he tries to teach the boys.It shows that Hector sees knowledge as precious- he has an unconventional kind of dogma style which he sees as vital to the boys gentility of life in general, and of particular importance is that the boys are aware of this. As Timms says, Mr. Hectors stuffs not meant for the exam, sir. Its to strike us to a greater extent rounded human beings. when the boys are questioned by Irwin on Hectors teaching style. Furthermore, Hector believes in giving the boys the ability to defy the education they have been given- You give them an education.I give them the wherewithal to resist it he says, in conversation with factual Mrs. Lintott. Hectors teaching style is lively and compassionate, teaching the boys to love what they do. In contrast, Irwin, who is hired to prepare the boys for their exams, is totally centered on exam techniques. When reflecting on the essays he has just marked, he remarks that the other boys and girls who have been to capital of Italy and Venice, Florence and Perugia will k now when they come to do an essay analogous this on the Church on the eve of the Reformation that some silly meaninglessness on the foreskins of Christ will come in handy.And doing so he advises the boys to make their essays controversial so they stand out, regardless of what is true or what is considered correct or disciplined- in fact, Irwin approaches History in a insubordinate and oppositional personal manner to spark questioning. Iriwns bold stance on education is summed up when he says that truth is no more at issue in an examination that thirst at a wine-tasting or fashion at a strip tease- yet again reinforcing the idea that if the boys want to set in to Oxford and Cambridge, they exigency to make their essays contentious and different rather than Dull. charter also History QuizzesDull. Abysmally Dull. His idea that silly nonsense will snap up the examiners eye comes into conflict with Hectors teaching style and the token of Hectors trust when Irwin finds out that th e boys have acquired countless gobbets from Hectors lessons that he believes would be useful for the exams- Dont tell me thats useless knowledge, he says, pointing out that any piece of knowledge or quote or gobbet could help them get through their exams.Hectors compassionate teaching is at ace odds with Irwins edgy style, and even though he disagrees wholeheartedly with the way Irwin approaches learning- call them what you equivalent, only do not call them gobbets- he is involuntary to help Irwin do his job- However, if you think it will help, I will chat to them. Mrs Lintott, the boys history teacher, has a very factual and straightforward approach to teaching which sees the boys through their A levels- Their A levels are very good. And that is thanks to you, Dorothy. She is more concerned with facts than anything else, and her belief is that Plainly stated and properly organised facts fate no presentation, surely. But the headmaster of the school is looking for something d ifferent, rather like Irwin- Think charm. Think polish. Think Renaissance Man. Mrs Lintott is frustrated by the need for presentation and the fact that the dons fall for the tactics employed by people like Irwin, however, and compares it to A sprig of parsley, you mean? Or an umbrella in the cocktail? outlining her dry, sarcastic, distrustful humour, and show her disrespect for jazzing up facts to be acknowledged and noticed, as Irwin does. As Rudge puts it, when speaking to Mrs Lintott about Irwin, Youve force-fed us the facts now were in the process of rivulet around acquiring flavour. In conclusion, Bennett presents three different teaching styles in the play by showing the audience not just the teachers lessons but by giving the audience an idea of what the teachers personalities and outlooks on life are, showing that teaching and learning involve so much more than exam results.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment