Eddie plays Essay

The third of these parts is an actual character in the figure out. Alfieri plays a lawyer that Eddie goes to for advice. Alfieri works in a poor community and solo deals with sm all told neighbourhood affairs. Morally and Legally you have no right, you lavatory non throw in the towel it is a piece of advice Eddie receives from Alfieri, he ignores the advice and chooses to deal with it his own agency by breaking the neighbourhood code of honour. Alfieri as a character feels he displace no longer change Eddies mind and feels rather powerless at this measure. The last part Eddie plays is the epilogue.This is the small speech Alfieri says at the finis of the play which is rather same a acclaim. A eulogy is a speech made at a funeral. It usually outlines the skinny points about the deceased person. When the play is portrayed on stage, Alfieri has a rattling important part to play as the epilogue. The speech has to look effective, the lights thick down and Alfieri negotiation to the auditory modality. This speech is aimed at the auditory modality and ends the play on a serious note.. The epilogue takes an effect on the on the earr separately as there are women keening on the stage in an separate(prenominal) words crying on there knees.This has strong effect on the audience while Alfieris reading the epilogue. This is experiencen as reflective time following the sudden violent action of Eddies conclusion. Alfieri trys to say good things about Eddie. He describes him I think I will love him more than all my sensible clients the epilogues message is proverb something nice about Eddie. Alfieri is saying Eddies case is very(prenominal) variant to the rest of his cases he has dealt with . Eddie added excitement to Alfieris normally dull life style and Alfieri will miss that.By the saying settle for half Alfieri mean the audience would probably settle for compromise. In A View from the bridgework Eddie is see as the fighter, unfortunately every tragic hero has a weakness and for Eddie his tragic Weakness is his desire for Catherine his Niece. Eddie finally realises he trickt have her When Beatrice tells him in the final scene. She begins verbalise Eddie she loves him, when he doesnt respond she tells him you want somethin else Eddie and you can never have her The actress wouldnt be angry while delivering the joint but she wouldnt be talented either.To face up to their partner loving someone else is very hard, curiously telling them you hunch forward and induceing out its your niece. Catherine and Eddie react in horror to what they have just heard and Eddie continues to deny it. Eddie is so unspoilt of horror at hearing this speech be lay down he knows his secret is out, its in addition the shock of someone saying you fancy your niece. This ticks translated into anger against Marco because Eddie has been acquiring more and more annoyed and when Beatrice tells him he sees Marcos challenge immaterial as a means o f physically venting his anger, pain and frustration.The apocalypse to himself of his desires for Catherine would be tearing his mind apart so the audience would see a an close to insane. As in a classic cataclysm Marco is seen as Eddies inevitable doom, Eddie cannot escape death. There have been more failed attempts to pr change surfacet the final tragedy, these have been made by Alfieri, Catherine, Beatrice and even Rodolpho. Rodolpho tries to spot Eddie by saying No he has children, you will destroy a family But this still doesnt substantiation Eddie fighting with Marco. As before long as Eddie finds out about Rodolpho and Catherine he is on the path to destruction.This is shown in the final meeting Eddie has with Alfieri, also when he rejoinders home drunk to find Rodolpho and Catherine have probably had sex. In the play Eddie has a high contain for respect this can often hazard other characters in the play as Eddie reels them in and pop outs them involved. At the st art of the final scene Eddie tells Beatrice that if she attends the married couple she cant come lynchpin to their house. When Eddie tells Beatrice she cant return to his house the audience would be quite surprised. Beatrice having to miss out on her nieces wedding just because Eddie doesnt want to lose his pride.The audience would be telling Beatrice just to go to the wedding but she doesnt want to lose Eddie. Eddie feels that Catherine owes him respect because he took her in after her overprotect and father died and he also paid for her stenograph lessons so she could get a well paid job. Catherine then enters from the bedroom and seems as if she didnt hear Beatrice and Eddies conversation. She asks Beatrice if shes ready as the wedding starts at three and the priest wont reside. When Eddie asks Beatrice whose side shes on, Catherine reacts differently to her upstanding attitude throughout the play.She shortly shouts Who the hell do you think you are? this makes an impressi on on Beatrice and Eddie. Moreover, the audience have not heard her speak same this before. Beatrice tells Catherine to sssh but Catherine doesnt listen and continues to insult Eddie. This is quite shocking to the audience because at some(prenominal) moment Eddie could hurt Catherine as the audience know what hes capable of and can see the anger in his eyes. As Catherine continues Beatrice also tells Catherine to shut up but she doesnt listen. Beatrice ignores Catherine when she tells her to come this is when she calls Eddie a rat.He bites people when they sleep He comes when nobodys lookin and poisons decent people. In the garbage he belongs. Catherine refers to Eddie as a sewage rat because he is under the ground and lower than anyone else. Catherine feels Eddie belongs in the garbage. Also miller is exploitation a pun. The American colloquialism to rat on somebody is the said(prenominal) as the English grass somebody up which is wha ople had for Eddie. By telling what Eddie had done, Marco took away the respect Eddie had, therefore he stole his name-which is referred to as a mark of respect.When Eddie addresses the people about Marco stealing his respect he talks about all he has done for Marco and Rodolpho. He explains how he took them in and how hed never even seen them before. He makes vague references to the sacred scripture and feels he offered them sanctuary from the world outside and the law. Little bits of laughter even escape him as his eyes are murderous. This is a condemnation from the stage directions when Eddie is saying his speech to the neighbourhood. This is the first part which shows Eddie is suitable virtually insane with anger.His anger is continually boiling up over the whole play and the argument with Marco is a time when he can permit it all out and it adds to the excitement of the argument. The way Eddie speaks makes him seem to be passing game virtually insane. He makes the argument out as if its all Marcos fault and even s eems to forget about Rodolpho a and Catherine. In his speech Eddie starts it off with a series of rhetorical questions and it doesnt payoff because Eddie doesnt give Marco time to answer. milling machine makes Eddie say the speech because Eddies anger has had a dramatic effect on the audience.The speech is very similar to other tragedies. Eddies address is desire an aria in an opera, ample of passion which here is making Eddie almost incoherent. Eddie gives Marco an option, if he gives him his name back they can go peacefully to the wedding. Of course Marco declines. When Eddie makes the offer to Marco, He makes it in the street in front of everyone. He feels Marco has done wrong and he continues to deny telling the immigration bureau. Eddie just wants Marco to tell the neighbourhood he was lying then everything will be ok. tho, Eddies tone of condescension would grate in the audience.The public confrontation that Eddie and Marco have is true of westbound cowboy films. This r elates to Millers opinion that the Brooklyn waterfront was like the wild west. The participants usually head 10 paces then face distributively other and fight like a duel. Cowboy films were very popular in the 1950s with actors like Alan Ladd, Gregory Peck and John Wayne.. The creative thinker of a western confrontation comes from the phrase A mans gotta do what a mans gotta do. Arthur Miller once said the waterfront in the 1950s that it was the wild west, a withdraw from beyond the law.The confrontation Eddie and Marco have is based on the idea of a man has to stand up for what he believes in and Eddie is doing that by asking for his name back but Marco was also doing that because he believed he should have told the neighbourhood what Eddie had done. The duel between Eddie and Marco is very much like that in a typical Wild West film. Like gunfighters plan of attack each other down the high street, Eddie and Marco are approaching each other across the stage. Each as in a typic al western duel challenges the other.Eddie says Marco, tell them what a liar you are both(prenominal) actors have their arms outspread similar to the gun fighters hands hovering above their hoisted guns. Like in a cowboy duel Eddie makes the first move lunging for Marco. As in a western the spectators trouser in surprise however Marcos superior strength strikes Eddie to the ground. Marco calls Eddie animal showing that Eddie can no longer consider himself human. This is similar to Catherine rather calling him a rat. Marco also shouts Get on your knees to me this is the dramatic way Marco demands respect.Miller emphasises Marcos rage by use of exclamation marks. However Eddie breaks the rules of the duel by producing a knife causing Marco to step back. When the audience see Eddie go down they would probably be take aback because although the tommyrot is like a Greek tragedy the audience might not have known that. When Eddie goes down the audience would be happy Eddie can cau se no more damage but as the hero the audience will have become rather attached to him. When Eddie produces the knife they would be surprised but anxious at the same time.They know that either Eddie or Marco is going to die, the way the actors portray the fight would affect the way the audience felt. The knife ups the stakes and makes a violent death even more of a possibility. When Eddie and Marco begin to fight, Louis trys to inject and stop them for Christs sake When Louis says this Eddie raises the knife and appears as if hes going to strike as Louis has seen the way Eddie is acting he believes he will do it and steps back, leaving Eddie and Marco to face each other. Miller makes Louis intervene as a sort of last reanimate to stop the fight.His wife, his niece and his wifes cousins have all attempted to stop the fight happening and each of them have failed. Miller feels that a supporter can usually stop you doing something that isnt right. Unfortunately Eddie made a big mist ake using a knife because this fight is becoming his last. Marco intentionally turns the blade inwards and forces Eddie to stab himself. This ties in with the idea of a Greek tragedy. The hero facing his inevitable doom. From the beginning of the play Marco was seen as Eddies inevitable doom. A View from the Bridge is similar to other tragedies where the hero meets his inevitable doom. Macbeth written by William Shakespeare arised from the idea of a Greek tragedy. The main character mentioned in the title, meets his inevitable doom at the end of the play. Another play written by Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet also arises from a Greek tragedy when two of the main characters meet their doom. I was quite shocked when I heard the end of the play. Even though I knew it was a Greek tragedy I didnt expect Eddie to die.From the way Miller describes Marcos appearance I could tell he would probably cause some trouble. When Marco picked the chair up over Eddie you could tell Marco wasnt horrif ied of confrontation if necessary. I think that the message Miller was trying to get across is that fighting isnt the answer and that whatever happens was meant to happen, its your fate. At the end when Alfieri says the epilogue I think Miller means we can come to a compromise and if they cant then offer away, or else we to will have to face the same consequences as Eddie Carbone.