History

DIFFERING VIEWS OF MANUFACTURINGThe two accounts provide radically different views of manufacturing in Britain during the 1830s , when the industrial Revolution was very much underway . While Andrew Ure s enter is praise-heavy and acknowledges no negative aspects at all (other than criticism of perseverance , the House of Commons inquiry offers a first-hand account of exacting , grinding , and even horrific conditions child churners facedSource 22 .1 , Extolling the Virtues of the shaper is an 1835 report intended as an answer to critics claims that constancy has had ignominious effects on British society . However , its stem (Andrew Ure merely avoids the criticisms and drowns them out with lofty praise . Ure asserts that manufacturing has not sole(prenominal) generated considerable wealth for Britain , but also t hat it has brought the resources of war [and] satisfied subsistence for the population (p . 374 .

In somewhat overblown prose , Ure adds that British labor has even benefitted the world at large and quickly dismisses intentness s critics whose specific accusations he does not discussUre argues that , for example , weavers in steam-driven mannequin mills are not overworked rather , he says , the resist force [of steam power] leaves the attendant nearly nothing to do at all (p . 374 ) and that mills provide a rosy workplace . He sidesteps the issues of factory-related illnesses , long working hours , and poor intervention of workers , instead shi! fting the blame onto the worker s poor nutriment and the dampness of his hovel (p . 374 in essence , he blames workers for in some way opting for...If you want to get a generous essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper